With the resumption of enforcement against bogus self-employment in early 2025 and the submission of the bill on Clarification of the Assessment of Employment Relationships and Legal Presumption (VBAR) to the House of Representatives shortly before the summer recess, the issue of self-employed workers has once again come into focus for many. And rightly so, because a study conducted by the research firm Motivaction showed that the impact on self-employed individuals should not be underestimated. Nearly 60 percent have noticed that the number of assignments suitable for self-employed individuals has decreased since the beginning of this year.

In addition, HeadFirst, in collaboration with the knowledge platform ZiPconomy and ONL for Entrepreneurs, recently published the report “A Decade of Self-Employed Workers: Facts, Figures, and Trends.” The figures show that, for the first time, there has been a decline in the number of self-employed workers: from 1.21 million in 2023 to 1.2 million in 2025. Nevertheless, the self-employed population remains extremely satisfied with their working conditions: over 80 percent. Interestingly, this decline primarily affects the group of self-employed individuals who are not involved in the debate over bogus self-employment (self-employed individuals who sell products or offer their own labor to private individuals).  

Once again, the ball is in the politicians’ court to respond to the widespread call from the self-employed and clients for greater clarity. How? Only a few parties still support the “Clarification of the Assessment of Employment Relationships and Legal Presumption” (VBAR) bill, while a broad group of parties in the center of the political spectrum is expressing support for the “Self-Employed Persons Act” initiative proposed by the VVD, CDA, D66, and SGP. With the House of Representatives elections approaching and new power dynamics emerging in parliament, it is helpful to provide an overview of the various plans put forward by the political parties.  

 

VVD: support for the self-employed persons act

The VVD is committed to the further development (and eventual implementation) of the aforementioned Self-Employed Persons Act. The proposal aims to provide greater legal clarity regarding the rights and obligations of self-employed individuals and clients through a self-employment and employment relationship assessment. Part of this proposal also includes additional obligations and responsibilities for the self-employed, such as arranging coverage for disability and retirement. Furthermore, the party supports the introduction of a legal presumption of employment in cases of low hourly rates and the introduction of mandatory disability insurance for the self-employed, though with an opt-out option. Prospective Member of Parliament Claire Martens-America provided further clarification on the VVD’s plans in an interview with ZZP Kiest.  

D66: fewer differences between employees and the self-employed

Like the VVD, the social liberals support the further development and implementation of the Self-Employed Persons Act. According to the party, it is high time that “clarity is provided regarding the status of the self-employed.” Furthermore, the legal presumption of employee status will be introduced for those earning a low hourly rate, and the differences between employees and the self-employed in social security and taxation must be reduced. Finally, D66 supports the introduction of mandatory, affordable group disability insurance for the self-employed, in accordance with the recommendation of the Labor Foundation. In a podcast, parliamentary candidate Hans Vijlbrief discussed D66’s plans.  

GroenLinks-PvdA: more security for workers

GroenLinks-PvdA prioritizes security, including for self-employed workers: the party aims to combat bogus self-employment by stepping up enforcement and holding clients more accountable. The party supports the “employee unless” principle, and self-employed workers may only be hired for assignments that do not fall within the organization’s regular activities. There should also be mandatory disability insurance for all self-employed workers, including a fair contribution from the client and an income-based premium. In an interview with ZZP Kiest, parliamentary candidate Mariëtte Patijn provided more clarity on the coalition party’s plans. 

CDA: more clarity for self-employed individuals and clients

The CDA advocates clarifying the status of self-employed individuals by amending the law. Incidentally, the Self-Employed Persons Act is not explicitly mentioned in the election platform. However, according to the CDA, self-employed individuals should take responsibility for securing an income in the event of disability, and a legal presumption of employment based on a certain hourly rate should offer greater protection to vulnerable workers with low hourly rates. 

SP: end bogus arrangements and tackle forced self-employment

The Socialist Party views the rise in the number of self-employed workers as a result of an over-flexible labor market. According to the party, anyone who works for a single client on a long-term basis should be employed as a regular employee. Forced self-employment must be combated. To protect self-employed workers, a collective and public solution for disability and retirement benefits will be implemented. 

BBB: more freedom, fewer obligations

Notably, the BBB does not support either the VBAR bill or the Self-Employed Persons Act. Through a “VAR-light” system, clients and self-employed individuals should be given more certainty up front. Excessive regulation is rejected, and self-employed individuals at the bottom of the labor market—earning less than €36 per hour—should be protected through a legal presumption of employment. The party supports plans to introduce disability insurance, but with an opt-out option. Prospective Member of Parliament Henk Vermeer provided further clarification on the BBB’s plans in an interview with ZZP Kiest.

NSC: the labor market must be fairer

NSC supports the plans and proposals outlined in the Borstlap Commission’s January 2020 report. According to NSC, this recommendation forms the basis for a fair and future-proof labor market. Self-employed individuals should be given clarity regarding the framework within which they can conduct their business. The law will establish a legal presumption of employment status for hourly rates below €36, and the party supports the introduction of the bill on Basic Disability Insurance for the Self-Employed (BAZ). In this interview, prospective Member of Parliament Tjebbe van Oostenbruggen provides further explanation of the NSC’s platform.  

JA21: simplifying the rules

JA21 wants to simplify the regulations governing the hiring of self-employed individuals. To provide more clarity for self-employed individuals, the party is looking to the Belgian model. The party does not want mandatory disability insurance for self-employed individuals. However, the party does want to abolish tax provisions such as the self-employed tax deduction and the start-up tax deduction. 

SGP: support for self-employed individuals

According to the SGP, the ongoing uncertainty facing self-employed individuals must come to an end. Therefore, this group should receive legal recognition through the establishment of a clear definition with corresponding criteria. The party supports the implementation of the Self-Employed Persons Act, and enforcement efforts against bogus self-employment should focus on certain high-risk sectors. Furthermore, the party supports mandatory disability insurance for self-employed individuals, but with an opt-out option. Self-employed individuals in the agricultural sector are exempt from this insurance requirement. As far as the SGP is concerned, self-employed individuals can continue to be called upon during “peak periods and when sick.” 

DENK: the balance between security and freedom

According to DENK, self-employed individuals who consciously choose to be independent entrepreneurs should be given the freedom to do so. There must be a workable legal framework for self-employment, so that there is no longer any ambiguity for self-employed individuals and clients. The party does not support the VBAR bill, but nor does it explicitly express support for the Self-Employed Persons Act. The party also wants to see the introduction of an affordable and collectively organized disability insurance program. DENK is open to an opt-out option. 

Christian Union: tackling excessive flexibilization

The ChristenUnie supports the introduction of the VBAR bill to provide greater clarity for clients and self-employed individuals. The differences between the self-employed and employees must be reduced. According to the party, tax benefits for the self-employed should be phased out at a reasonable pace and consolidated into a single earned income tax credit, and mandatory disability insurance for the self-employed is necessary. 

Conclusion

There are clear differences among the political parties regarding the self-employed issue. On the left, parties place great emphasis on protection, security, and the introduction of mandatory disability insurance. In the center of the political spectrum, parties seek a balance between freedom of choice and obligations. The proposed Self-Employed Persons Act could play an important role in this regard. The various plans and proposals were discussed in a webinar organized by ZZP Kiest.  

Clear criteria for determining self-employment status remain an important issue for many self-employed individuals. This was once again evident from an election survey conducted by the Freelance Market Index (FMI). With a new House of Representatives on the horizon and, later, the formation of a new cabinet, many self-employed individuals and clients are wondering which parties are actually willing to take constructive and workable steps on this issue.  

We remain in dialogue with policymakers in The Hague and, through reports and studies, make an important contribution to the discussion about the future of the labor market and the position of the self-employed.